With respect to academic assessment, the last several years
at Utica College, especially 2016-2017, have been busy, somewhat painful, and
incredibly fruitful in terms of developing a meaningful, coherent, and useful
system. I say that with a touch of irony,
since I know that Utica College’s faculty members have always assessed
their students’ learning and their own success in teaching them, and the
College has been a pioneer in some practices, like systematic and regular
program reviews, that have become standards in our profession.
Nonetheless, we have realized for some time that we have not
kept pace sufficiently with our colleagues at other institutions in terms of
the emerging best professional practices for generating, reporting, and acting
on academic assessment data. So…the last
few years have been a heavy lift, getting back up to speed and recapturing our
former leadership position. It would be
idle not to admit that one of the spurs to action has been the prospect of our
reaccreditation review by Middle States.
But, of course, that is one of the purposes of reaccreditation – to spur
institutions on in a process of self-examination and recognition of areas to
improve.
More important, I think, has been the increasing recognition
by all of us that, while the national “assessment movement” has been associated
with more than its share of hyperbolic rhetoric, it has behind it some very
important, and highly academic, values.
As academics, we value evidence.
As academics we value action that is impelled by careful scrutiny of
evidence and rational planning based on it.
We value processes that are systematic rather than haphazard and
idiosyncratic. We value progress rather
than stagnation, and challenge rather than complacency. Most importantly, I have never seen a
faculty more engaged with and committed to its students than UC’s faculty. We value being able to bring out the best of
ourselves on their behalf.
My sense is that this is a faculty that may have taken its
time shaping a highly formed academic assessment agenda and culture, yet is now
rapidly developing a high level of skill in, and sense of the importance of, assessment
in achieving our long-standing educational goals. As assessment processes become more and more
embedded in our individual professional lives and in our institutional fabric,
we realize increasingly how imperative it is that we engage in effective
assessment in order to identify specific areas of weakness and strength. This positions us to address the current
challenges we face and to improve the student experience. We expect this increasingly of ourselves and
of each other, which will not change after the Middle States team leaves. Very quickly we have become dependent on
assessment, a dependency that is both healthy and empowering, and constitutes a
resource that we will use increasingly as we pursue our aspirations for our
students and ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment