Wednesday, December 8, 2021

AAC's Response to the North Pole's Gift-Giving Process

The Academic Assessment Committee recently reviewed the gift-giving process practiced at the North Pole. What follows is the committee’s feedback and suggestions regarding these practices.

Santa has articulated an outcome ("Children should be nice"), but the wording is too ambiguous, and, therefore, hard to measure. Further, he has not specified an appropriate target. Should 100% of the children be "nice" 100% of the time? 90%? 75%? Without a clearly defined target, Santa risks being arbitrary and inconsistent in his assessment of children's behaviors. 

 The methods Santa uses to assess children's behavior and distinguish between "naughty" and "nice" are not apparent. How often is he able to observe each child first-hand?   Are there others who are involved in this assessment? Santa's elves or Mrs. Claus, for example? Given how high stakes this assessment is, there should be multiple individuals engaged in observing and evaluating children's behavior, and there should be 90% inter-rater reliability. Further, each individual child's behavior should be observed on numerous occasions throughout the assessment cycle. This may not be a sustainable plan, however, particularly given the recent cuts made to the workshop staff as a result of the pandemic and the shortages caused by the supply chain problem.  

 It is also not clear what instrument is used to document children’s' behaviors. Does Santa use a rubric that articulates clear criteria regarding the kinds of behaviors he regards as "nice" versus "naughty?" Do these criteria take into account cultural differences?  In other words, are Santa's assessment practices equitable?  

 The results of Santa's assessments have never been published or analyzed. What percent of the world's population under the age of 10 gets what they asked for? What percent receives coal in their stockings? Are there specific trends that Santa has observed over a period of time--say the last 100 years?  Has the percentage of naughty children increased? Decreased?

Since the purpose of assessment is to inform improvement, how are Santa's findings shared with and used by parents? Or do his "naughty" and "nice" lists remain in a drawer in his office at the North Pole and referenced only during the Christmas season as a prop?  How might parents (and perhaps even teachers) use them to help develop children’s character?

The committee recommends that Santa reflect more deeply on his assessment processes and consult with other characters such as the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy to get ideas for how he might design an assessment plan that is fair, useful, and sustainable.  

 

Reflection as A Means of Measuring the Transformative Potential of Higher Education

Several years ago (and at another institution), I attended a meeting where a faculty member was presenting a revised general education curri...